February 24, 2013

Hometown Hero: The CALIFORNIA LIST and Bettina Duval




Hometown Hero:  The CALIFORNIA LIST and Bettina Duval
SUSAN CLOKE
Columnist, Santa Monica Mirror
February 22. 2013


Duval started The CALIFORNIA LIST (http://californialist.org/) in April 2002.  Her mission?  To create opportunities for women to run for public office and the election of pro-choice, democratic women to the California State Senate, Assembly and Executive Branch.  “I started The LIST because it was a way for me to meld together my experience and my passion.  I’m proud and honored to be as involved as I have been,” said Duval.
Bettina Duval
President and Founder
The CALIFORNIA LIST

“In California we think we’re ahead of the game because we have representing us three very powerful women in national public office.  Senator Feinstein, Senator Boxer and Congresswoman Pelosi.  The role of The CALIFORNIA LIST is to help create the pipeline for our next generation of women leaders.  Attorney General Kamala Harris is a rising star in California political life.  Debra Bowen, Julia Brownley, Karen Bass, and Judy Chu are wonderful examples of women holding public office.  Early in their political careers The CALIFORNIA LIST encouraged and supported these office holders.

“Thankfully public perspective has changed during my growing up years and now most Americans have favorable views of women who run for office and there is a continually increasing expression of a comfort level with women holding public office.”

Duval credits the 1972 Title IX Act,  “a watershed moment for women as changing higher education in the United States and, under the laws of unintended consequences, also contributing to broader, societal changes in the perception of women in public life,”

Duval was raised by a strong, independent and loving single mom and loving grandparents.  They were a family of four and lived in Davis CA.  Duval went to Berkeley for college.  She studied rhetoric and considered becoming a lawyer.  At Berkeley she ran for student government and lost but that got her the position of Commissioner for Student Elections. 

She was introduced to the League of Women Voters when she needed to bring in credible outside monitors for the student elections.  Her introduction to legislative politics had started earlier, at Davis Senior High School, where she was on student government and the first student representative to sit on the Davis Board of Education.  When she graduated from Davis Senior High School she received the Gordon H. True Cup, a coveted award for service to the school.

Duval recounts an early ‘aha’ moment when she was an intern for then State Assemblyman Vic Fazio and Senator John Dunlap and was sent to Sacramento on a work errand.  “In 1978 I was in the Galley at the State Capitol and looked down at the floor.  It seemed to be all men.  No, there were 38 men and 2 women.  It made an impression on me and was a catalyst for my future work.”

Duval has a list of accomplishments on her path to starting her own organization in support of electing women to public office.  After graduating from Berkeley she moved to DC to work at the law firm of Covington and Burlington.  It was there she realized she didn’t want to pursue a career in law.  One of the partners was part of the Mondale/Ferraro campaign and she went to work for them as an advance person.

That brought her to San Francisco where she met Glenn Duval.  They married in 1985.  He is part of a family owned Cable Television Company in LA and that helped them to decide to move to the Hollywood Hills after their marriage.   Duval became active in the Junior League of Los Angeles in 1986 eventually becoming League President.  Her position required her to be out in the community essentially full time and was a great introduction to Southern California for her.

In 1990 they decided to move to Santa Monica, which they saw as “a great community and a wonderful place to raise our children.   My husband is a Republican and that makes for lively dinner table conversations!   Those conversations, along with my work, spiked the interest of our children.  Our oldest son formed his own political party at UCSB, “Better Our School System” (BOSS), our eldest daughter has been part of Student Government at Johns Hopkins, another daughter is at Berkeley and is on the crew team, and our youngest is applying to Boys State.  All are very politically aware and understand that political decisions impact them as individuals as well as impacting the world they live in.”

In Santa Monica, Duval became active in local campaigns, another major catalyst for her.  She then decided to go to work as the Southern California Director for Emily’s list.  It was 2002 and there were 34 women elected to state public office, 24 in the State Assembly and 10 in the State Senate.

Now, as the President of The CALFORNIA LIST, Duval continues to look for ways to support women running for public office.  “What’s happening with women, I think, is that they are not running for office in the numbers they could be and so we are actively seeking to understand how to help women decide to run for office.  We also continue working with the women who have run for office, whether they won or lost.  We are looking at new ways of fundraising.  And, of course, the Internet has allowed us to change and grow in wonderful ways.”

Bettina Duval ended our interview saying, “It is wonderful when you are supporting a great candidate.  There is something very wonderful about watching the achievements and contributions of the women I’ve helped to win elective office and I’m excited about continuing this work.”



February 15, 2013

What Say You. The Development Agreement Conversation





What Say You.  The Development Agreement Conversation
SUSAN CLOKE
Columnist, Santa Monica Mirror
February 9, 2012


Development Agreement (DA) is the buzzword of the day when talking about new building projects in Santa Monica.  Although the City entered into its first DA in the 1980’s only a handful have been processed since.  Now the City has a whopping 31 DAs in the pipeline. And that’s what the conversation is all about.

A development agreement is a tool in the planning toolbox.  It allows a city and a developer to enter into a negotiated contract for an exchange of rights and benefits not covered by other, standard planning tools such as conditional use permits and variances.  It is a tool that allows greater flexibility.  Note however that, by law, all Development Agreements must be consistent with the LUCE.

The LUCE, adopted in 2010, is a blueprint for the build out of the City for the next 20 years.  The Zoning Ordinance must conform to the LUCE as it lays out development rights.  The new Zoning Ordinance is in progress and a draft will go to the Planning Commission this coming spring and to the Council for final approval at the end of 2013. 

The Planning Department currently lists 48 pending applications, a mix of DA requests and Administrative Approvals.  Four are hotels: the Miramar, the Courtyard Marriott, the Hampton Inn and 710 Wilshire.  Two are for auto dealerships.  One is for a Science Classroom Building.  One is Bio Tech Research and Development.  The rest are for residential development.  Some are residential only and some ask for ‘mixed use’, which is a combination of residential and office and/or commercial.

The two largest projects are ones that, due to their size and their complexity, would be DA applications even after the new Zoning Ordinance is adopted. 

One, The Miramar proposes to “redevelop a mixed use hotel with new food and beverage facilities, spa, banquet facilities, retail space along Wilshire Boulevard and condominiums on the upper floors of new buildings and the retention and rehabilitation of the existing Palisades Building and the preservation of the Landmark Moreton Bay Fig Tree.” 

At issue are the design changes to a locally and internationally known hotel, the increased size and scale of the proposed project for a new total of 565,000 sq. ft., the addition of new condominiums, and the addition of affordable housing on 2nd Street property owned by the hotel. 

Central to the discussion are the community benefits being offered by the hotel and/or requested by the City as part of the negotiation of the DA contract.  The Miramar has had two ‘float up’ hearings in front of the Planning Commission and one ‘float up’ hearing in front of the City Council.  

The largest requested DA is located on the old Papermate site in the Bergamot District.  It is proposed to be a mixed use Creative Arts/Residential and Neighborhood Commercial for a total of 766,000 sq.ft.  That includes 498 new residential units in 361,000 sq. ft.; creative arts spaces in 375,000 sq.ft.; and neighborhood commercial in 30,000 sq.ft.

The 766,000 sq.ft. currently being requested is a significant reduction from the original application.  The proposal has met with community opposition to both the proposed scale and to the design.

Both projects have been in the pipeline for several years with community meetings and planning meetings. Further meetings for both projects are on a to be determined basis and there will be much discussion on each of these projects in the community and at public hearings.

But what about the projects that are not grabbing public attention? The greatest number of projects on the Planning Department list is residential.  Planning Director David Martin said, “This increase is the result of several factors including: LUCE policies that encourage the construction of mixed-use residential projects along transit boulevards and near light rail stations, a CEQA exemption for mixed-use housing projects with 100 units or less located within one half mile of a major transit stop, an increase in the number of rental housing units being proposed and constructed in the Los Angeles region, historically low interest rates, the strong demand for housing in Santa Monica, the stability of Santa Monica as a place to invest, and the overall desirability of the city as a place to live.

Reading from the list of pending applications we see, for example, 32 units in a total of 31,717 sq.ft.; 55 units in a total of 33,137 sq.ft.; 100 units in a total of 54,280 sq.ft.; 100 units in a total of 54,942 sq.ft.; 100 units in a total of 55,064 sq.ft.; 100 units in a total of 37,200 sq.ft.; 498 units in a total of 361,000 sq,ft.  These are seven examples of the proposed 40+ projects that include residential development.

Do the math and you will see that what is being proposed is mostly studios along with some small one bedroom units.  Perfectly wonderful as part of a larger mix, but of concern if all, or most, are in this low end of the size range.

Housing of this size and type is traditionally temporary in nature.  It is designed for students or for starter housing.  It could be used as a weekend or vacation getaway for someone with a house elsewhere.  It could have many uses but it typically has one, sometimes two, occupants and a relatively high turnover.

We could change the demographics of our population if all of the proposed residential development were approved as proposed.  We could have a less permanent population and therefore perhaps one that is less involved in the City.  Yet much of our dynamism as a City comes from the sense of ownership of the City that is felt by so many.  

Analyzing the size of residential units to understand their impact on the future of the City is an essential part of the complex decision making process that should go into every DA negotiation. 

The LUCE identified Santa Monica as needing more housing and it identified affordable housing as a community benefit. Building smaller units is one way to create affordable housing but there are other ways.  Affordable housing for families, for people who work in the City but can’t afford to live here are also identified in the LUCE as a community benefit.

Each project needs to be looked at with an understanding of how it will enhance or detract from the character of the City. Will it bring the kind of benefits identified as we went through the LUCE process? What are the traffic impacts of the project? What are its impacts on schools and parks and City services?   What benefits will the project bring to the City? 

The hard part for everyone, through all this dry reading, is to be able to “see” the changes each project would make to the future life of the City.  But it is that understanding that the Council will ask for as they review the list of projects in the pipeline again at its February 12 meeting.

We want good applicants.  Their projects are a part of what makes Santa Monica a dynamic city.  As we approve new development let’s remember why the City is so desirable and let’s make decisions protective of the character of the City even as it grows and changes.

What Say You?